SUSPECTED M87
Equatorial coordinates
α = 187.684833 | 12 30 44.360000
δ = 12.383897 | +12 23 02.030000 |
|
Constellation |
Virgo |
Symbiotic IR Type |
|
Spectral Type |
|
Magnitude range (V) |
|
Outbursts |
Yes |
|
|
Identifiers
[SDL2016] Nova 36 |
GSC – |
TYC – |
WRAY – |
SIMBAD [SDL2016] Nova 36 |
HIP – |
SAO – |
Hen – |
BD – |
IRAS – |
GAIA DR2 – |
ESO – |
HD – |
2MASS – |
WISE – |
AAVSO – |
Position
Right ascension (°) |
187.684833 |
Parallax (mas) |
– |
Reddening E(B-V) (mag) |
0.020 ± 0.001 |
Declination (°) |
12.383897 |
Distance (kpc) |
16400 ± 500 |
|
|
Galactic longitude (°) |
283.712331 |
Proper motion in α (mas/yr) |
– |
|
|
Galactic latitude (°) |
74.478091 |
Proper motion in δ (mas/yr) |
– |
|
|
Observations
U (mag) |
|
X-Ray |
|
Flickering |
|
B (mag) |
|
X-Ray type |
|
Outbursts |
Yes |
V (mag) |
25.91 |
IUE |
No |
Type |
SyN? |
R (mag) |
|
IRAS flux at 12 μm (Jy) |
|
IPmax (eV) |
|
I (mag) |
25.17 |
IRAS flux at 25 μm (Jy) |
|
OVI lines |
|
G (mag) |
|
IRAS flux at 60 μm (Jy) |
|
|
|
J (mag) |
|
IRAS flux at 100 μm (Jy) |
|
|
|
H (mag) |
|
WISE W1 (mag) |
|
|
|
K (mag) |
|
WISE W2 (mag) |
|
|
|
L (mag) |
|
WISE W3 (mag) |
|
|
|
|
|
WISE W4 (mag) |
|
|
|
|
|
Radio |
|
|
|
|
|
Radio flux (mJy) |
|
|
|
Orbit
Orbital period (days) |
|
γ velocity (km/h) |
|
Size of giant’s orbit (AU) |
|
Eccentricity |
|
RV of giant (km/h) |
|
Separation (AU) |
|
Inclination (°) |
|
Inferior conj. of giant (JD) |
|
Mass function |
|
Ephemeris type |
|
|
|
Mass ratio |
|
Ephemeris T0 (JD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cool component
Spectral type |
|
Mass (M⊙) |
|
Pulsation |
|
Eff. temperature (K) |
|
Radius (R⊙) |
|
Type |
|
IR type |
|
Luminosity (L⊙) |
|
Pulsation period (days) |
|
Metallicity [Fe/H] |
|
|
|
Ephemeris type |
|
|
|
|
|
Ephemeris T0 (JD) |
|
Hot component
Type/Spectra |
|
Mass (M⊙) |
|
Spin period (min) |
|
Eff. temperature (K) |
|
Radius (R⊙) |
|
Accretion disk |
|
Lower limit (K) |
|
Luminosity (L⊙) |
|
|
|
Upper limit (K) |
|
|
|
|
|
Links
SIMBAD CDS Portal
Notes
Identified as an optical nova by Shara et al. (2016). They concluded that the object could be a symbiotic or very slow nova.
References
- Shara, M. M., Doyle, T. F., Lauer, T. R., et al., 2016, ApJS, 227, 1, 2016ApJS..227….1S
Last updated: May 12, 2019 @ 8:45 pm