MISCLASSIFIED
MILKY WAY
|
LAMOST J202629.80+423652.0 | IRAS - | GSC2.4.2 N30Y000285 | AAVSO - |
SIMBAD LAMOST J202629.80+423652.0 | Pan-STARRS 159133066241927965 | SAO - | VSX - |
GAIA DR3 2068897501817271424 | SkyMapper - | WRAY - | GCVS - |
2MASS J20262980+4236519 | HIP - | Hen - | BD - |
WISE J202629.79+423651.9 | TYC - | ESO - | HD - |
Bidelman (1954) | - | Allen (1984) | - | Belzcyński et al. (2001) | - |
Gaposchkin (1957) | - | Kenyon (1986) | - | Akras et al. (2019) | LAMOSTJ202629.80+423652.0 (Conf.) |
Boyarchuk (1969) | - | Vaidis (1988, 1991) | - |
Right ascension (°) | 306.6241Ref | Parallax (mas) | 0.774±0.013Ref | Reddening E(B-V) (mag) | 1.48±0.03Ref, Note |
Declination (°) | 42.6144Ref | Distance (kpc) | 1.24Ref, Note, 1.24Ref, Note | ||
Galactic longitude (°) | 80.5396Ref | Proper motion in α (mas/yr) | -8.73±0.01Ref | ||
Galactic latitude (°) | 2.5672Ref | Proper motion in δ (mas/yr) | -7.99±0.02Ref |
Initially classified as a symbiotic binary by Li et al. (2015) based on a spectrum revealing numerous emission lines, including Raman-scattered O VI lines. However, upon obtaining and analyzing additional data, Li et al. (2015) concluded that the initially claimed symbiotic spectrum was an artifact of problematic subtraction. The object, as per their findings, is not a symbiotic star nor a pulsating object; instead, their spectrum is consistent with a G8 IV star.