MISCLASSIFIED
MILKY WAY
|
V562 Lyr | IRAS - | GSC2.4.2 N2DN001210 | AAVSO 000-BCW-357 |
SIMBAD V* V562 Lyr | Pan-STARRS 164372778075392249 | SAO - | VSX 18602 |
GAIA DR3 2118838071562342400 | SkyMapper - | WRAY - | GCVS V0562 Lyr |
2MASS J18311381+4658347 | HIP - | Hen - | BD - |
WISE J183113.81+465834.7 | TYC - | ESO - | HD - |
Bidelman (1954) | - | Allen (1984) | - | Belzcyński et al. (2001) | - |
Gaposchkin (1957) | - | Kenyon (1986) | - | Akras et al. (2019) | - |
Boyarchuk (1969) | - | Vaidis (1988, 1991) | - |
Right ascension (°) | 277.8076Ref | Parallax (mas) | 0.278±0.012Ref | Reddening E(B-V) (mag) | 0.04±0.0Ref, Note |
Declination (°) | 46.9763Ref | Distance (kpc) | 3.27Ref, Note, 3.25Ref, Note | ||
Galactic longitude (°) | 75.4532Ref | Proper motion in α (mas/yr) | -2.07±0.02Ref | ||
Galactic latitude (°) | 22.7573Ref | Proper motion in δ (mas/yr) | -4.30±0.02Ref |
In Guilbault et al. (2000), a study on the photometric variability of the star led to its classification as a possible symbiotic star. However, a subsequent spectroscopic analysis of the object by Merc et al. (2021) revealed no emission lines and no signs of the hot component in the ultraviolet. The authors claimed that the data are consistent with an alternative scenario of a single giant star.